That's It: I Quit! I'm Moving On...
Feb. 12th, 2011 04:47 pmHerein lies a tale where I, a well-meaning but occasionally clueless fan of Doctor Who, have yet another pointless discussion that seems to center around semantic distinctions I make that other people seem to find negligible or non-existent. I managed to quit before becoming rude and irate, but it was hard.
If you're so inclined, take a look at this thread and tell me what it is I'm missing in this discussion. (My reply begins: "I don't think the 'sexualization' of Amy is anything new for a companion on Who..." Oh, and if you can't be arsed, and would rather wag your finger at me and say "I told so!" regarding anon memes, you'd be more than justified in doing just that.)
I'd like to believe that the world is wrong and/or stupid, but I suspect instead that my brain is just too rigid and detail-oriented to engage in any sort of rational debate without it devolving into a non-sensical discussion of how we're going to define the word "is". (Bill: I feel ya, man! /incredibly topical reference)
Many a well-meaning friend has sat me down and patiently explained to me that "other people just don't look at things the way you do. They're not as 'careful' in the way they speak." My argument that that's their problem to solve seems to be greeted with a sigh and a slightly-less-patient head pat.
Does anyone else run into this problem, where you think you're discussing one thing and the person you're talking to just keeps going on about something else? Do the details matter, or are you a big picture person? HELP ME I AM FAILING AT SOCIAL SKILLS AGAIN! :P
If you're so inclined, take a look at this thread and tell me what it is I'm missing in this discussion. (My reply begins: "I don't think the 'sexualization' of Amy is anything new for a companion on Who..." Oh, and if you can't be arsed, and would rather wag your finger at me and say "I told so!" regarding anon memes, you'd be more than justified in doing just that.)
I'd like to believe that the world is wrong and/or stupid, but I suspect instead that my brain is just too rigid and detail-oriented to engage in any sort of rational debate without it devolving into a non-sensical discussion of how we're going to define the word "is". (Bill: I feel ya, man! /incredibly topical reference)
Many a well-meaning friend has sat me down and patiently explained to me that "other people just don't look at things the way you do. They're not as 'careful' in the way they speak." My argument that that's their problem to solve seems to be greeted with a sigh and a slightly-less-patient head pat.
Does anyone else run into this problem, where you think you're discussing one thing and the person you're talking to just keeps going on about something else? Do the details matter, or are you a big picture person? HELP ME I AM FAILING AT SOCIAL SKILLS AGAIN! :P
no subject
Date: 2011-02-13 02:55 am (UTC)OMG, we are twin spirits! I was painfully shy as a child and spent most of my time reading. Therefore, I had a very interesting vocabulary and communication style as a child.
Still do, if I'm completely honest! When I posted samples of my work on
On a completely unrelated note, my boyfriend will probably be friending you soon because I've said so many lovely things about you.
Aww, so sweet! It's nice to know that while people might hate me on an anon meme, there are others saying nice things behind my back! :P What's his username?
no subject
Date: 2011-02-13 02:57 am (UTC)The boyperson is
no subject
Date: 2011-02-13 03:21 am (UTC)I sort of feel bad friending people based on shared fandoms, as I spend so little time talking about them here. The last couple days have been the most I've talked about fan stuff in AGES!
no subject
Date: 2011-02-13 03:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-13 03:38 am (UTC)